Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lucy Dunthorne's avatar

Brilliant yet again Alex!

The Abstract Mind's avatar

I notice there's a lot of blame going toward social media, and "Ol Mr Mark." But I think the real issue runs deeper than that, it's about our own accountability. Let me flip it, contrarian-style.

Derek doesn't have to hold himself accountable because... maybe all his peers are on TikTok too, so why should he be the one to change? It's a dopamine system, designed to pull control away from him, so surely he's not really doing anything wrong. It's TikTok, YouTube, Mark's Metaverse — even though Mark doesn't actually control TikTok or YouTube or X, but anyway. I have to stay current or I lose touch. Everyone around me is doing the same thing.

So maybe Derek doesn't need to change anything. All the control sits with Apple, Meta, Google. Instead of asking Derek to do something, maybe we should just "bring down" the tech giants? Except that's not really possible. And where would Derek even learn how to cut back on social media — on social media, of course. Where do we preach about this? Also social media.

Maybe the problem sticks around until we're willing to look a little closer to home.

So how do you actually take on that kind of power? Simple in theory, just stop using it. If 20 million people stopped using Instagram for a day, it would struggle. But so would the small creators trying to make a living from it.

So what's the answer?

Maybe it's less about preaching that social media is ruining us, and more about learning to live with it well — adapting to it, even making peace with it. None of us are deleting it for good, so the more useful skill is accountability and control.

Take alcohol as a comparison. If I drink all day, my life falls apart, and people would fairly say I'd made a bad call. Alcohol is engineered to be moreish too, but we don't excuse heavy drinking by blaming "Big Alcohol" instead. Plenty of people drink responsibly, which is part of why we allow it in society despite its risks.

The same is true of social media. Plenty of people use it well: building businesses, connecting, teaching, supporting others. And some people make dopamine-chasing clickbait. So who's really the issue? Not the platform itself, but what gets made and what we choose to watch. Someone puts together a brilliant documentary series that could genuinely educate people, and yet because of the rubbish elsewhere, the instinct is to tear down the whole system.

It comes back to choices. Spend five hours a day scrolling, and there are consequences; but they're the result of choices, not fate.

It's worth noting that even the most serious addiction models agree with this balance.

- They hold two things at once: first, that addiction is genuinely hard to escape. There's a real vulnerability or disease element that makes it more than "just weak willpower."

- But second, that recovery is still built entirely on agency. Every major treatment approach; CBT, motivational interviewing, 12-step programs, puts the person's own choices at the centre of getting better.

Social media isn't so different. However, we're telling ourselves a narrative that makes it feel like it is.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?